<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<doi_batch xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.3.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.3.1 http://www.crossref.org/schema/deposit/crossref5.3.1.xsd" version="5.3.1">
  <head>
    <doi_batch_id>batch-1791614216</doi_batch_id>
    <timestamp>1791614216</timestamp>
    <depositor>
      <depositor_name>Global Insights Law Journal</depositor_name>
      <email_address>publisher@gilawjournal.com</email_address>
    </depositor>
    <registrant>Global Insights Law Journal</registrant>
  </head>
  <body>
    <journal>
      <journal_metadata language="en">
        <full_title>Global Insights Law Journal</full_title>
        <issn media_type="electronic">3141-5717</issn>
      </journal_metadata>
      <journal_issue>
        <publication_date media_type="online">
          <year>2026</year>
        </publication_date>
        <journal_volume>
          <volume>1</volume>
        </journal_volume>
        <issue>3</issue>
      </journal_issue>
      <journal_article publication_type="full_text" language="en">
        <titles>
          <title>The Legal Protection and Conservation of Marine Biodiversity for a Sustainable Future in Nigeria</title>
        </titles>
        <contributors>
          <person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="first">
            <given_name>Chikanma</given_name>
            <surname>Aleru</surname>
          </person_name>
        </contributors>
        <jats:abstract xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1.2/">
          <jats:p>Marine biodiversity underpins ecological stability, food security and the maritime trade on which national economies depend. Nigeria's marine and coastal endowment, particularly in the Niger Delta, faces acute pressure from oil pollution, overfishing, destructive fishing, unplanned urbanisation and the dumping of waste. Adopting a doctrinal methodology, this article examines the legal and regulatory framework for the protection of marine biodiversity in Nigeria and assesses how effectively it is implemented. It reviews the constitutional, statutory, regional and international instruments that bind Nigeria and the regulatory techniques they deploy (licensing, prohibition, sanction, punishment and quotas), with comparative lessons from the United States and the United Kingdom. The article finds that Nigeria does not lack law or institutions; it lacks effective enforcement. Penalties are in several instances negligible, or inverted in proportion to the harm caused; no statutory quota system exists; no marine protected area has been designated; technical capacity and inter-agency coordination are weak; and public awareness is low. The article recommends law reform with deterrent penalties, a statutory quota regime modelled on United States sanctuary regulation, the designation of marine protected areas, institutional capacity building, public education, and deeper regional and private-sector partnership.</jats:p>
        </jats:abstract>
        <publication_date media_type="online">
          <year>2026</year>
          <month>10</month>
          <day>5</day>
        </publication_date>
        <doi_data>
          <doi>10.67588/0004</doi>
          <resource>https://gilawjournal.com/article/the-legal-protection-and-conservation-of-marine-biodiversity-for-a-sustainable-future-in-nigeria</resource>
        </doi_data>
        <keywords>
          <keyword>Environment</keyword>
          <keyword>Environmental law</keyword>
          <keyword>Marine Biodiversity; Marine Protected Areas; Blue Economy; Sustainability; Sustainable Development.</keyword>
        </keywords>
      </journal_article>
    </journal>
  </body>
</doi_batch>
