<script type="application/ld+json">
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": [
"ScholarlyArticle",
"BlogPosting"
],
"@id": "https://gilawjournal.com/article/land-acquisition-and-compensation-under-nigerias-land-use-act-1978#article",
"headline": "Land Acquisition and Compensation under Nigeria\u2019s Land Use Act 1978",
"name": "Land Acquisition and Compensation under Nigeria\u2019s Land Use Act 1978",
"description": "This article examines compulsory land acquisition and compensation under Nigeria\u2019s Land Use Act 1978, analysing constitutional protections, judicial decisions,...",
"abstract": "This article presents a full-length, critically rigorous legal investigation into compulsory land acquisition, the revocation of rights of occupancy, and statutory compensation mechanisms under Nigeria\u2019s Land Use Act 1978 (LUA). Examining the delicate equilibrium between executive eminent domain and private property protections, the study evaluates the statutory framework against Sections 43 and 44 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended). Through a doctrinal methodology anchored in primary statutory provisions, authoritative judicial precedents, professional valuation guidelines, and comparative legal frameworks, the article addresses a fundamental research question: To what extent does the Land Use Act 1978 provide an adequate, constitutionally consistent, procedurally fair, and effective framework for compulsory land acquisition and compensation in Nigeria? The analysis reveals significant structural friction between statutory compensation formulas under Section 29, which restrict recovery to unexhausted improvements and deprecated replacement costs, and constitutional guarantees of prompt, fair indemnification. Furthermore, the paper examines the pivotal role of the Nigerian judiciary as a constitutional guardian, demonstrating how courts have strictly construed Section 28 revocation powers, invalidated statutory ouster clauses under Section 47(2), enforced mandatory personal service requirements (Orianzi v AG Rivers State), and established prompt payment as a mandatory condition precedent for valid acquisition (Olateju v Commissioner for Lands, Kwara State). The article contrasts general land administration under the LUA with specialized extractive regimes under the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) 2021, drawing comparative insights from India\u2019s RFCTLARR Act 2013 and International Finance Corporation (IFC) Performance Standard 5. Finally, the study proposes actionable legislative amendments to modernize valuation criteria, transition to open market valuation, entrench procedural transparency, and safeguard customary property rights.",
"author": [
{
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Alalibo, Biabere Ken Douglas"
},
{
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Aladokiye Emmanuel Gabriel Whyte"
}
],
"creator": [
{
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Alalibo, Biabere Ken Douglas"
},
{
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Aladokiye Emmanuel Gabriel Whyte"
}
],
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"@id": "https://gilawjournal.com#organization",
"name": "Global Insights Publishing",
"url": "https://gilawjournal.com",
"logo": {
"@type": "ImageObject",
"url": "https://gilawjournal.com/storage/cms/site/giljlogo-tks2p4cy-1-rhewVont.png"
},
"email": "info@gilawjournal.com",
"description": "Global Insights Law Journal publishes peer-reviewed legal scholarship on law, governance, justice, and society.",
"knowsAbout": [
"Legal scholarship",
"Peer review",
"Constitutional law",
"Human rights law",
"Commercial law",
"International law",
"Governance",
"Tech Law",
"Oil and Gas Law",
"Legal Articles"
]
},
"isPartOf": {
"@type": "PublicationIssue",
"issueNumber": "3",
"datePublished": "2026",
"isPartOf": {
"@type": "PublicationVolume",
"volumeNumber": "1",
"isPartOf": {
"@type": "Periodical",
"name": "Global Insights Law Journal",
"issn": "3141-5717",
"url": "https://gilawjournal.com"
}
}
},
"datePublished": "2026-10-24T10:00:00+00:00",
"dateModified": "2026-10-26T10:08:06+00:00",
"keywords": ": Land Use Act 1978; Compulsory Land Acquisition; Revocation of Right of Occupancy; Overriding Public Interest; Statutory Compensation; Section 29 LUA; Section 44 1999 Constitution; Judicial Review; Petroleum Industry Act 2021; Valuation Methodology",
"inLanguage": "en",
"url": "https://gilawjournal.com/article/land-acquisition-and-compensation-under-nigerias-land-use-act-1978",
"mainEntityOfPage": {
"@type": "WebPage",
"@id": "https://gilawjournal.com/article/land-acquisition-and-compensation-under-nigerias-land-use-act-1978"
},
"sameAs": "https://doi.org/10.67588/0010",
"identifier": [
{
"@type": "PropertyValue",
"propertyID": "DOI",
"value": "10.67588/0010"
},
{
"@type": "PropertyValue",
"propertyID": "URL",
"value": "https://gilawjournal.com/article/land-acquisition-and-compensation-under-nigerias-land-use-act-1978"
}
],
"encoding": {
"@type": "MediaObject",
"encodingFormat": "application/pdf",
"contentUrl": "https://gilawjournal.com/article/land-acquisition-and-compensation-under-nigerias-land-use-act-1978/download"
},
"associatedMedia": {
"@type": "MediaObject",
"encodingFormat": "application/pdf",
"contentUrl": "https://gilawjournal.com/article/land-acquisition-and-compensation-under-nigerias-land-use-act-1978/download"
},
"copyrightHolder": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "Global Insights Law Journal"
},
"copyrightYear": 2026,
"genre": "Original Article",
"articleSection": "Original Article",
"isAccessibleForFree": true,
"speakable": {
"@type": "SpeakableSpecification",
"cssSelector": [
"h1",
"#article-abstract"
]
},
"about": [
"Original Article",
": Land Use Act 1978; Compulsory Land Acquisition; Revocation of Right of Occupancy; Overriding Public Interest; Statutory Compensation; Section 29 LUA; Section 44 1999 Constitution; Judicial Review; Petroleum Industry Act 2021; Valuation Methodology"
],
"citation": [
{
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"text": "1. Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended), Cap C23, LFN 2004.2. Land Use Act 1978, Cap L5, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria (LFN) 2004.3. Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) 2021, Federal Republic of Nigeria Official Gazette No. 142, Vol. 108.4. Public Lands Acquisition Act 1917, Cap 167, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 1958.5. Land Tenure Law 1962, Cap 59, Laws of Northern Nigeria 1963.6. Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013 (Act No. 30 of 2013, India)."
},
{
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"text": "Judicial Precedents"
},
{
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"text": "1. A. O. Osho & Anor v Foreign Finance Corporation & Anor (1991) 4 NWLR (Pt. 184) 157 (SC).2. Abioye v Yakubu (1991) 5 NWLR (Pt. 190) 130 (SC).3. Alhaji Kanada v Governor of Kaduna State (1986) 4 NWLR (Pt. 35) 361 (CA).4. Chief D. O. Ereku & Ors v Military Governor, Mid-Western State of Nigeria & Ors (1974) 10 S.C. 59.5. Nkwocha v Governor of Anambra State (1984) 6 S.C. 362.6. Obikoya v Governor of Lagos State (1987) 1 NWLR (Pt. 50) 385 (CA).7. Ogunleye v Oni (1990) 2 NWLR (Pt. 135) 745 (SC).8. Olateju v Commissioner for Lands & Housing, Kwara State (2024) 17 NWLR (Pt. 1968) 473 (SC).9. Orianzi v Attorney-General of Rivers State & Ors (2017) LPELR-41737 (SC); (2006) 11 NWLR (Pt. 992) 530.10. Ori v Uche (2010) 2 NWLR (Pt. 1179) 582 (CA).11. Provincial Pastor v Attorney-General, Ondo State (2014) LPELR-22822 (CA)."
},
{
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"text": "Books and Treatises"
},
{
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"text": "1. Nwabueze B O, Nigeria's Land Use Act: Law and Policy (Nwamife Publishers 1982).2. Omotola J A, Essays on the Land Use Act 1978 (Lagos University Press 1984).3. Smith I O, Practical Approach to Law of Real Property in Nigeria (2nd edn, Ecowatch Publications 2013)."
}
],
"hasPart": {
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"name": "References",
"text": "1. Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended), Cap C23, LFN 2004.
2. Land Use Act 1978, Cap L5, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria (LFN) 2004.
3. Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) 2021, Federal Republic of Nigeria Official Gazette No. 142, Vol. 108.
4. Public Lands Acquisition Act 1917, Cap 167, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 1958.
5. Land Tenure Law 1962, Cap 59, Laws of Northern Nigeria 1963.
6. Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013 (Act No. 30 of 2013, India).
\r\nJudicial Precedents
\r\n1. A. O. Osho & Anor v Foreign Finance Corporation & Anor (1991) 4 NWLR (Pt. 184) 157 (SC).
2. Abioye v Yakubu (1991) 5 NWLR (Pt. 190) 130 (SC).
3. Alhaji Kanada v Governor of Kaduna State (1986) 4 NWLR (Pt. 35) 361 (CA).
4. Chief D. O. Ereku & Ors v Military Governor, Mid-Western State of Nigeria & Ors (1974) 10 S.C. 59.
5. Nkwocha v Governor of Anambra State (1984) 6 S.C. 362.
6. Obikoya v Governor of Lagos State (1987) 1 NWLR (Pt. 50) 385 (CA).
7. Ogunleye v Oni (1990) 2 NWLR (Pt. 135) 745 (SC).
8. Olateju v Commissioner for Lands & Housing, Kwara State (2024) 17 NWLR (Pt. 1968) 473 (SC).
9. Orianzi v Attorney-General of Rivers State & Ors (2017) LPELR-41737 (SC); (2006) 11 NWLR (Pt. 992) 530.
10. Ori v Uche (2010) 2 NWLR (Pt. 1179) 582 (CA).
11. Provincial Pastor v Attorney-General, Ondo State (2014) LPELR-22822 (CA).
\r\nBooks and Treatises
\r\n1. Nwabueze B O, Nigeria's Land Use Act: Law and Policy (Nwamife Publishers 1982).
2. Omotola J A, Essays on the Land Use Act 1978 (Lagos University Press 1984).
3. Smith I O, Practical Approach to Law of Real Property in Nigeria (2nd edn, Ecowatch Publications 2013).
"
},
"articleBody": "This article presents a full-length, critically rigorous legal investigation into compulsory land acquisition, the revocation of rights of occupancy, and statutory compensation mechanisms under Nigeria\u2019s Land Use Act 1978 (LUA). Examining the delicate equilibrium between executive eminent domain and private property protections, the study evaluates the statutory framework against Sections 43 and 44 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended). Through a doctrinal methodology anchored in primary statutory provisions, authoritative judicial precedents, professional valuation guidelines, and comparative legal frameworks, the article addresses a fundamental research question: To what extent does the Land Use Act 1978 provide an adequate, constitutionally consistent, procedurally fair, and effective framework for compulsory land acquisition and compensation in Nigeria? The analysis reveals significant structural friction between statutory compensation formulas under Section 29, which restrict recovery to unexhausted improvements and deprecated replacement costs, and constitutional guarantees of prompt, fair indemnification. Furthermore, the paper examines the pivotal role of the Nigerian judiciary as a constitutional guardian, demonstrating how courts have strictly construed Section 28 revocation powers, invalidated statutory ouster clauses under Section 47(2), enforced mandatory personal service requirements (Orianzi v AG Rivers State), and established prompt payment as a mandatory condition precedent for valid acquisition (Olateju v Commissioner for Lands, Kwara State). The article contrasts general land administration under the LUA with specialized extractive regimes under the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) 2021, drawing comparative insights from India\u2019s RFCTLARR Act 2013 and International Finance Corporation (IFC) Performance Standard 5. Finally, the study proposes actionable legislative amendments to modernize valuation criteria, transition to open market valuation, entrench procedural transparency, and safeguard customary property rights.",
"dataAvailability": "Upon request"
}
</script>
This article metadata is also available via OAI-PMH protocol at:
https://gilawjournal.com/oai-pmh